Walters v. Evick
California Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the CourtHart, Acting P. J.
These are actions for damages for personal injuries alleged to have been sustained by the respective plaintiffs and appellants through the negligence of the defendants. The injuries to the two plaintiffs occurred at the same time under precisely the same circumstances and from the same alleged cause. At the opening of the trial, it was expressly stipulated by and between the respective parties that, inasmuch as the witnesses and the testimony would be the same, the two eases he consolidated and tried together before the same jury, and the court made an order in accordance with said…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Gray v. EschenCalifornia Supreme Court · 1899
- Sutter Butte Canal Co. v. Am. Rice & Alfalfa Co.California Supreme Court · 1920
- Bognuda v. PearsonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1925
- Finkelstein v. CosgroveCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1927
- Murray v. KundeCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1928
3Cited by7 opinions
- Gottstein v. DalyWashington Supreme Court · 1932
- Smith v. RothschildCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1934
- Cisco Systems, Inc. v. Dexon Computer, Inc.District Court, N.D. California · 2022
- Elgindy v. AGA Service CompanyDistrict Court, N.D. California · 2021
- Joy Johnson v. Navient CorporationDistrict Court, C.D. California · 2025
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.