Finkelstein v. Cosgrove
California Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the Court
CAMPBELL, J., pro tem.
This appeal is from a judgment entered in favor of respondent upon the verdict of the jury. Appellant relies for a reversal of the judgment entirely upon alleged errors in the instructions of the court to the jury. It is not contended that the verdict of the jury is against the evidence.
Respondent has called our attention to the fact that the record does not indicate at whose request the instructions complained of were given and urges that appellant cannot be heard to complain of error in the instructions, since it is not shown that they were not given at his request and…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Skrocki v. StahlCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1910
- Gray v. EschenCalifornia Supreme Court · 1899
- Sutter Butte Canal Co. v. Am. Rice & Alfalfa Co.California Supreme Court · 1920
- Bognuda v. PearsonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1925
- Doyle v. Republic Life Insurance Co.California Supreme Court · 1899
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Hayes v. EmersonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1930
- Tischhauser v. JarvisCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1928
- Walters v. EvickCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1928
- Murray v. KundeCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1928
- Webb v. Los Angeles Railway Corp.California Court of Appeal · 1933
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.