Smith v. Rothschild

This action for damages for personal injuries was tried before a jury and resulted in a judgment in favor of plaintiffs for the sum of '$7,500. Defendant appeals from said judgment.

Appellant’s main contention is that “plaintiffs were guilty of contributory negligence as a matter of law and the alleged negligence of the defendant did not proximately cause the accident”. In support of this contention appellant argues the facts at length, but cites no authorities to sustain her position. The essential facts may be briefly, stated. Respondents were riding on a motorcycle coming down the grade in…