Legal Opinion

Bognuda v. Pearson

California Court of Appeal

Decided January 31, 1925No. Docket No. 2756PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtHart, J.

The plaintiff sued the defendants to secure a judgment for damages in the aggregate sum of eight thousand dollars, alleged to he the extent, measured in money, of the injury alleged to have been inflicted upon the crops of alfalfa growing on certain lands of plaintiff in Glenn County and upon said lands by the alleged acts of the defendants in causing said lands to be flooded with water. The complaint specifically describes those acts, and the answer likewise denies each and all of the averments of plaintiff’s pleading.

The cause was tried by a jury, who awarded the plaintiff damages in the…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Morey v. PaladiniCalifornia Supreme Court · 1922
  2. Des Granges v. Des GrangesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1917
  3. Gray v. EschenCalifornia Supreme Court · 1899
  4. Sutter Butte Canal Co. v. Am. Rice & Alfalfa Co.California Supreme Court · 1920
  5. In Re Estate of BarneyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1923

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Peters v. United Studios, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 1929
  2. Salt River Enterprises, Inc. v. HeinerWyoming Supreme Court · 1983
  3. Wittmann v. WhittinghamCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1927
  4. Shaver v. United Parcel ServiceCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1928
  5. In Re Basin State BankWyoming Supreme Court · 1931

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API