Legal Opinion

Murray v. Kunde

California Court of Appeal

Decided April 30, 1928No. Docket No. 3201PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtHart, J.

The plaintiff brought this action for damages in the sum of $10,000 for the alleged wrongful arrest of his person upon a process alleged to have been maliciously caused by defendant to be issued by one Marvin T. Vaughan, justice of the peace in and for Santa Rosa township, in the county of Sonoma. The cause was tried before a jury and a verdict returned in favor of plaintiff in the sum of $1,000. Upon the verdict so rendered, judgment was entered in favor of plaintiff for said sum.

The appeal here is by the defendant from said judgment.

The alleged false arrest was founded on a complaint filed…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Gray v. EschenCalifornia Supreme Court · 1899
  2. Sutter Butte Canal Co. v. Am. Rice & Alfalfa Co.California Supreme Court · 1920
  3. Bognuda v. PearsonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1925
  4. Finkelstein v. CosgroveCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1927

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Ambrose v. AllenCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1931
  2. Knight v. GosselinCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1932
  3. Walker v. JensenCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1949
  4. Garfield v. Peoples Finance & Thrift Co.California Court of Appeal · 1937
  5. Walters v. EvickCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1928

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API