Legal Opinion
District of Columbia Bar v. Kleindienst
District of Columbia Court of Appeals
Decided August 11, 1975No. S-37-75PublishedCited by 35 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM ORDER
2Per curiam
The Disciplinary Board of this court concluded, consistent with a report of a Hearing Committee, that respondent violated Disciplinary Rules 1-102(A)(4) and (5) 1 by virtue of misrepresentations and dishonest conduct prejudicial to the administration of justice. The Board found specifically that respondent “was guilty of direct and repeated misrepresentations in answering persistent inquiries about White House involvement in Justice Department litigation against ITT.”
*147The Board’s quoted finding is correct. The evidence discloses that during Senate confirmation hearings on…
3Cases cited6 opinions
- Selling v. RadfordSupreme Court of the United States · 1917
- Matter of RoussNew York Court of Appeals · 1917
- In the Matter of the Petition of SellingSupreme Court of the United States · 1917
- In Re DurantSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1907
- In Re RandolphSupreme Court of Missouri · 1961
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
4Cited by35 opinions
- In Re HutchinsonDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1987
- State Bar of Nevada v. ClaiborneNevada Supreme Court · 1988
- In Re KennedyDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1988
- Matter of WilliamsDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1986
- In Re AbramsDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1997
30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.