Legal Opinion
In Re Stanton
District of Columbia Court of Appeals
Decided November 30, 1983No. M-124-82PublishedCited by 30 opinions
1Per curiam
This matter is before us for our consideration of the Report and Recommendation of the Board on Professional Responsibility (Board).
The Board has found one instance of respondent’s “neglect of a legal matter entrusted to him” in violation of DR 6-101(A)(3) and two acts of respondent’s “intentional failure to seek a client’s lawful objectives” in violation of DR 7-101(A)(l). 1 The Board recommends suspension of respondent for sixty (60) days. We accept the Board’s findings of fact as being supported by substantial evidence of record, and adopt the Board’s recommended suspension of respondent…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- In Re StantonDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1983
3Cited by30 opinions
- John Stanton v. District of Columbia Court of AppealsCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1997
- In Re HinesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1984
- In Re RosenDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1984
- In the Matter of ThompsonDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1985
- In Re DrewDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1997
25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.