Gault v. Thurmond
Supreme Court of Oklahoma
Error from District Court, Dewey County; G. A. Brown, Judge. Action by Sam Gault against I. C. Thurmond. Judgment for defendant, and plaintiff brings error.
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion by
SHARP, C.
The first, second, and seventh assignments of error are based upon the action of the court in the exclusion of evidence. While it is doubtful if either of the questions asked were competent, from the character thereof, there being no offer made on the part of counsel as to what the excluded evidence would have been had the court permitted the witness to answer the questions asked, we cannot say that any error was committed. Lamont Gas & Oil Co. v. Doop & Frater, ante, 135 Pac. 392; Hutchings v. Cobble, 30 Okla. 158, 120 Pac. 1013; Turner v. Moore, 34 Okla. 1, 127 Pac. 487;…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Hobbs v. SmithSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1911
- Hutchings v. CobbleSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1911
- Lamont Gas & Oil Co. v. Doop & FraterSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1913
- Turner v. MooreSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1911
- Cobe v. GuyerIllinois Supreme Court · 1908
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Chicago, R. I. & P. Ry. Co. v. PruittSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1917
- Ford v. PerrySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1917
- Mitchell v. FisherSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1934
- American Fidelity Co v. EcholsSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1916
- Creek Coal Mining Co. v. PaprottaSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1918
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.