American Fidelity Co v. Echols
Supreme Court of Oklahoma
Error from District Court, Greer County; G. A. Brown, Judge. Action by Samuel E. Echols against the American Fidelity Company of Montpelier, Vermont. Judgment for plaintiff, and defendant brings error.
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion by
BURFORD, C.
This was an action by Samuel E. Echols against the American Fidelity Company, of Montpelier, Vt., to recover indemnity for the loss of a hand, under the terms of an accident policy issued by the plaintiff in error in his favor. A trial was had to the jury, and a verdict returned in favor of the defendant in error (plaintiff in the court below), which verdict-was approved by the court, and judgment rendered thereon.
It is alleged as error:' First. That the plaintiff was allowed to recover a double indemnity, which was not justified under the terms of the policy. Second.…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Travellers' Insurance v. McConkeySupreme Court of the United States · 1888
- Capital Fire Ins. Co. v. CarrollSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1910
- Turner v. MooreSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1911
- Standard Accident Ins. Co. of Detroit, Mich. v. HiteSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1913
- Gault v. ThurmondSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1913
3Cited by6 opinions
- Lowe v. HickorySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1935
- Provident Life & Accident Ins. v. NitschCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1941
- Thompson v. CokerSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1925
- Town of Watonga v. MorrisonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1920
- Mid-West Insurance Co. v. ShraderSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1924
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.