Legal Opinion

Creek Coal Mining Co. v. Paprotta

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided July 23, 1918No. 9023PublishedCited by 6 opinions

Error from District Court, Okmulgee County; Ernest B. Hughes, Judge. Action by Gustave Paprotta against the Creek Coal Mining Company. Judgment for plaintiff, and defendant brings error.

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

SPRINGER, C.

This action was| instituted in' the district court of Ok-mulgee county by the plaintiff to recover the sum of $15,000 for alleged personal injuries caused by the negligent acts of the “timberman” in prying some stones from the roof of the room, or knocking some props from under the same where the plaintiff was at work, and which fell upon the plaintiff, and thereby produced the injuries of which complaint is made. For answer the defendant filed a general denial and further pleaded contributory negligence. The plaintiff recovered judgment in the lower court for $2,650.

I.…

2Cases cited22 opinions

  1. St. Louis S. F. R. Co. v. SnowdenSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1915
  2. Parker v. Boston & Hingham Steamboat Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1872
  3. Jones v. Citizens' State BankSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1913
  4. Partello v. Missouri Pacific Railway Co.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1909
  5. Louisville & Nashville Railroad v. StewartSupreme Court of Alabama · 1900

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Fullhart Maytag Company v. StapletonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1960
  2. Stagner v. FilesSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1938
  3. Price v. RogersSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1949
  4. Canadian Mining & Development Co. v. RobbinsSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1932
  5. Cooksey v. CookseySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1922

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API