Legal Opinion

Lamont Gas & Oil Co. v. Doop & Frater

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided September 23, 1913No. 2876PublishedCited by 17 opinions

Error from District Court, Grant County; W. M. Bowles,, Judge. Action by Doop & Erater against the Lamont Gas & Oil Company. Judgment for plaintiff, and defendant brings error.

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

SEIARP, C.

On the 20th day of December, 1909, in the district court of Grant county, Doop & Erater, a partnership, brought suit against the Lamont Gas & Oil Company, on account of an alleged indebtedness, due said partnership, arising out of a contract to drill two oil or gas wells for the defendant company. Plaintiff’s petition alleged that there was due it the sum of $1,078.75 for drilling and $1,064 for reaming a well by it drilled under said contract, and an additional cash bonus of $300, or a total of $2,442.75. The drilling contract relied upon by plaintiff was in writing, and…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Hutchings v. CobbleSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1911
  2. Kansas City Bridge Co. v. Lindsay Bridge Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1912
  3. Fayter v. NorthUtah Supreme Court · 1906
  4. Turner v. MooreSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1911
  5. Dodd v. WittMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1885

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by17 opinions

  1. Prowant v. SealySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1919
  2. Cities Service Oil Co. v. Geolograph Co., Inc.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1953
  3. Withington v. Gypsy Oil Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1918
  4. Continental Supply Co. v. LevySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1926
  5. Brown v. CoppadgeSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1915

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API