Legal Opinion

Ford v. Perry

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided October 9, 1917No. 7043PublishedCited by 11 opinions

Error from District Court, Pontotoc County ; Tom D. McKeown, Judge. Action by Casey Perry against R. P. Ford ■and others. Judgment for plaintiff, and defendants bring error.

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

BLEAKMORE, C.

This is an action in damages commenced in the district court of Pontotoc county on December 9, 1912, by Casey Perry (formerly Casey Peters), as plaintiff, against R. P. Ford, F. R. Harriss, and Henry Ford, defendants, resulting in judgment for plaintiff in the sum of $1,116 against the defendants jointly, and the additional sum of $800 against R. P. Ford; to reverse which this proceeding in error is prosecuted. The parties are re-referred to as they appeared in the trial court.

In her petition plaintiff alleges, in substance : That she is an enrolled member of tlie…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Hutchings v. CobbleSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1911
  2. Board of Com'rs of Garfield County v. RenshawSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1909
  3. Winans v. HareSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1915
  4. Webb v. LoganSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1915
  5. Lamont Gas & Oil Co. v. Doop & FraterSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1913

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. CALVERT v. SWINFORDSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 2016
  2. Gates v. Kansas Farmers' Union Royalty Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1941
  3. SCOTT v. PETERSSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 2016
  4. Eves Tall Chief v. AaronSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1922
  5. In Re Tinker's EstateSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1923

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API