Legal Opinion

J. T. Miller Co. v. Madel

Montana Supreme Court

Decided March 1, 1978No. 13796PublishedCited by 15 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Daly

This is an appeal from the findings, conclusions and order for judgment entered by the District Court, Yellowstone County. The court ruled the restrictive covenant contained in the employment agreement between the parties was ineffective in the state of Montana because it was violative of the public policy of this state and therefore unenforceable.

The material facts were stipulated to for the purpose of appeal. Plaintiffs J. T. Miller Co. and Upper Northwest Payment Plans Co. are engaged in the business of operating and managing a general insurance agency in Minneapolis, Minnesota. Defendant…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. H & R BLOCK, INC. v. LovelaceSupreme Court of Kansas · 1972
  2. Monogram Industries, Inc. v. Sar Industries, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 1976
  3. Vulcan Powder Co. v. Hercules Powder Co.California Supreme Court · 1892
  4. Mathews Paint Co. v. Seaside Paint & Lacquer Co.California Court of Appeal · 1957
  5. Gloria Ice Cream & Milk Co. v. CowanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1935

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. Bolz v. MyersMontana Supreme Court · 1982
  2. Mungas v. Great Falls Clinic, LLPMontana Supreme Court · 2009
  3. Dobbins, DeGuire & Tucker, P.C. v. Rutherford, MacDonald & OlsonMontana Supreme Court · 1985
  4. Lawrence v. HarveyMontana Supreme Court · 1980
  5. Dresser Industries, Inc. v. Duane J. Sandvick, Gary T. Petty, Steve Goodall, Petro-Chem, Inc., and Joe Don EideCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1984

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API