Legal Opinion

H & R BLOCK, INC. v. Lovelace

Supreme Court of Kansas

Decided January 22, 1972No. 46,182PublishedCited by 42 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

*539Harman, G:

This is an appeal by a plaintiff franchisor in an action brought by it to restrain an individual franchise from violating a covenant not to compete in the business of preparation of tax returns upon termination of the franchise. The issue here is the validity of the restrictive covenant.

The action was submitted to the trial court for determination upon undisputed facts which may be summarized as follows: Plaintiff H&R Block, Inc. is a corporation engaged in franchising individuals and other concerns to operate a business solely for the…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Arthur Murray Dance Studios of Cleveland, Inc. v. WitterCuyahoga County Common Pleas Court · 1952
  2. Foltz v. StruxnessSupreme Court of Kansas · 1950
  3. Heckard v. ParkSupreme Court of Kansas · 1948
  4. Mills v. ClevelandSupreme Court of Kansas · 1912
  5. John Lucas & Co. v. EvansSupreme Court of Kansas · 1935

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by42 opinions

  1. Atlantic Richfield Co. v. RazumicSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1978
  2. Rent-A-Center, Inc. v. Canyon Television & Appliance Rental, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1991
  3. Piercing Pagoda, Inc. v. HoffnerSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1976
  4. Varney Business Services, Inc. v. PottroffSupreme Court of Kansas · 2002
  5. Weber v. TillmanSupreme Court of Kansas · 1996

37 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API