Mungas v. Great Falls Clinic, LLP
Montana Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtJustice Warner
¶1 The Eighth Judicial District Court, Cascade County, granted summary judgment in favor of the Appellees, who are physicians and former partners in the Great Falls Clinic (Clinic). The District Court concluded that a portion of the Clinic partnership agreements is void under § 28-2-703, MCA, as a restraint upon exercising a lawful profession and granted summary judgment in favor of the Appellees. The Clinic appeals.
¶2 The facts which relate to the positions of Doctors Mungas, Dube, Mortenson, Harrer and Spencer differ from those relating to Doctors English and Key. The issues presented are:
¶3…
2Cases cited19 opinions
- Jacobsen v. Allstate InsuranceMontana Supreme Court · 2009
- Trustees of Indiana University v. BuxbaumMontana Supreme Court · 2003
- United National Insurance v. St. Paul Fire & Marine InsuranceMontana Supreme Court · 2009
- Lowery v. Garfield CountyMontana Supreme Court · 1949
- Sampson v. National Farmers Union Property & Casualty Co.Montana Supreme Court · 2006
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by36 opinions
- Associated Mgmt. Servs., Inc. v. RuffMontana Supreme Court · 2018
- Hughes v. AhlgrenMontana Supreme Court · 2011
- City of Helena v. SveeMontana Supreme Court · 2014
- Wohl v. City of MissoulaMontana Supreme Court · 2013
- Western Tradition Partnership, Inc. v. Attorney GeneralMontana Supreme Court · 2012
31 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.