Legal Opinion

Gloria Ice Cream & Milk Co. v. Cowan

California Supreme Court

Decided February 20, 1935No. Sac. 4799PublishedCited by 19 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtWaste, C. J.

Plaintiff had, for many years, engaged in the business of buying, selling, delivering and distributing milk, cream and general dairy products by means of and over established trade routes. It employed the defendant Charles Cowan as a salesman and driver to deliver its dairy products over one of its routes on which there was an established and going trade list of customers for its commodities. Plaintiff paid Cowan a stipulated weekly wage, and for three years he continued to serve the customers of plaintiff, using plaintiff’s equipment for the service. During the period of this service, Cowan…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Empire Steam Laundry v. LozierCalifornia Supreme Court · 1913
  2. Pasadena Ice Co. v. ReederCalifornia Supreme Court · 1929
  3. Avocado Sales Co. v. WyseCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1932
  4. Dairy Dale Co. v. AzevedoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1931
  5. State Ex Rel. Pacific County Bridge Co. v. Department of Public WorksWashington Supreme Court · 1929

3Cited by19 opinions

  1. Hollingsworth Solderless Terminal Co., a Corporation v. William Turley, an Individual and Hoffman Electronics Corporation, a CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1980
  2. Continental Car-Na-Var Corp. v. MoseleyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1944
  3. Sarkes Tarzian, Inc. v. Audio Devices, Inc.District Court, S.D. California · 1958
  4. California Intelligence Bureau v. CunninghamCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1948
  5. George v. BurdusisCalifornia Supreme Court · 1942

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API