Legal Opinion
Monogram Industries, Inc. v. Sar Industries, Inc.
California Court of Appeal
Decided December 8, 1976No. Civ. 48614PublishedCited by 40 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
COMPTON, J.
Monogram Industries, Inc., a company engaged in, among other things, the production and marketing of portable or nonconventional toilet systems, commenced this action against Sar Industries, Inc., Sarmax Corporation, Norris J. Bishton, Jr., and John S. Blick III, which entities and persons are engaged in a similar business, seeking damages for misappropriation of trade secrets and an injunction to enforce a covenant not to compete and negative provisions of a consulting agreement.
The trial court, on motion of Monogram, and after hearing thereon, issued a preliminary…
2Cases cited21 opinions
- Addyston Pipe & Steel Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1899
- United States v. Addyston Pipe & Steel Co.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1898
- Continental Baking Co. v. KatzCalifornia Supreme Court · 1968
- Arthur Murray Dance Studios of Cleveland, Inc. v. WitterCuyahoga County Common Pleas Court · 1952
- Southern California Jockey Club, Inc. v. California Horse Racing BoardCalifornia Supreme Court · 1950
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by40 opinions
- Blank v. KirwanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1985
- Don Ray Smith v. Cmta-Iam Pension TrustCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1981
- Murphy Tugboat Co. v. Shipowners & Merchants Towboat Co.District Court, N.D. California · 1979
- Vacco Industries, Inc. v. Van Den BergCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1992
- Biljac Associates v. First Interstate Bank of OregonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1990
35 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.