Legal Opinion

Vulcan Powder Co. v. Hercules Powder Co.

California Supreme Court

Decided November 29, 1892No. 13079PublishedCited by 40 opinions

The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.

1Opinion of the CourtMcFarland, J.

— On June 2,1884, a written contract was entered into by and between the Giant Powder Company, party of the first part, the California Powder Works, party of the second part, and the Safety Nitro Powder Company, the Vulcan Powder Company, and the California Vigorit Powder Company, parties of the third part, all corporations existing under the laws of this state. The contract was about the manufacture and sale of nitro-glycerine powders, called dynamite. This action was brought by the said Vulcan Powder Company, one of said parties of the third part, against all of the other parties, to…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Morse Twist Drill & Machine Co. v. MorseMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1869
  2. Jarvis v. PeckNew York Court of Chancery · 1843
  3. Mackinnon Pen Co. v. Fountain Ink Co.The Superior Court of New York City · 1882

3Cited by40 opinions

  1. United States v. Trenton Potteries Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1927
  2. United States v. Addyston Pipe & Steel Co.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1898
  3. Standard Oil Co. (Indiana) v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1931
  4. Ixchel Pharma, LLC v. Biogen, Inc.California Supreme Court · 2020
  5. State ex inf. Hadley v. Standard Oil Co.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1909

35 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API