Legal Opinion

In re Appeal of Bailey

Supreme Court of Vermont

Decided July 26, 2005No. 03-263PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

¶ 1. Plaintiff Richard E. Bailey appeals from an environmental court order affirming a decision by the Town of Arlington’s Zoning Board of *615Adjustment (Board) that granted a variance from the front and rear setback requirements for an undersized land parcel owned by Black Locust Development, LLC (applicant). Plaintiff contends that the court erred when it included a strip of land which is used as a public highway, although owned by applicant, in determining whether applicant’s property qualifies for treatment as a preexisting small lot under 24 V.S.A. § 4406(1) and the Arlington zoning…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Appeal of WeeksSupreme Court of Vermont · 1998
  2. Lubinsky v. Fair Haven Zoning BoardSupreme Court of Vermont · 1986
  3. Mall, Inc. v. City of SeattleWashington Supreme Court · 1987
  4. Wilcox v. Village of Manchester Zoning Board of AdjustmentSupreme Court of Vermont · 1992
  5. Drumheller v. Shelburne Zoning Board of AdjustmentSupreme Court of Vermont · 1990

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. In re Pierce Subdivision ApplicationSupreme Court of Vermont · 2008
  2. In re Application of Lathrop Limited Partnership I, II and IIISupreme Court of Vermont · 2015
  3. In Re Appeal of Jenness & BerrieSupreme Court of Vermont · 2008
  4. In re Appeal of Wesco, Inc.Supreme Court of Vermont · 2006
  5. In re Lathrop Ltd. Partnership ISupreme Court of Vermont · 2015

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API