In re Appeal of Bailey
Supreme Court of Vermont
1Opinion of the Court
¶ 1. Plaintiff Richard E. Bailey appeals from an environmental court order affirming a decision by the Town of Arlington’s Zoning Board of *615Adjustment (Board) that granted a variance from the front and rear setback requirements for an undersized land parcel owned by Black Locust Development, LLC (applicant). Plaintiff contends that the court erred when it included a strip of land which is used as a public highway, although owned by applicant, in determining whether applicant’s property qualifies for treatment as a preexisting small lot under 24 V.S.A. § 4406(1) and the Arlington zoning…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Appeal of WeeksSupreme Court of Vermont · 1998
- Lubinsky v. Fair Haven Zoning BoardSupreme Court of Vermont · 1986
- Mall, Inc. v. City of SeattleWashington Supreme Court · 1987
- Wilcox v. Village of Manchester Zoning Board of AdjustmentSupreme Court of Vermont · 1992
- Drumheller v. Shelburne Zoning Board of AdjustmentSupreme Court of Vermont · 1990
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- In re Pierce Subdivision ApplicationSupreme Court of Vermont · 2008
- In re Application of Lathrop Limited Partnership I, II and IIISupreme Court of Vermont · 2015
- In Re Appeal of Jenness & BerrieSupreme Court of Vermont · 2008
- In re Appeal of Wesco, Inc.Supreme Court of Vermont · 2006
- In re Lathrop Ltd. Partnership ISupreme Court of Vermont · 2015
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.