Legal Opinion

In re Pierce Subdivision Application

Supreme Court of Vermont

Decided August 1, 2008No. 2007-121PublishedCited by 41 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBurgess, J.

¶ 1. Neighbor appeals the Environmental Court’s approval of applicant’s proposed Planned Residential Development (PRD) adjoining his property in Ferrisburgh, Vermont. Under the Ferrisburgh Zoning Bylaws, a qualified PRD that proposes cluster housing and preservation of open space may be authorized by the Planning Commission by waiver of the standard rules governing single-house lot development. On appeal, neighbor claims that the court erred by concluding that: (1) the proposed subdivision meets the definition of a PRD as specified in the bylaws; (2) the project satisfies the space and…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. In Re Stowe Club HighlandsSupreme Court of Vermont · 1995
  2. Lubinsky v. Fair Haven Zoning BoardSupreme Court of Vermont · 1986
  3. In Re HandySupreme Court of Vermont · 2000
  4. In Re Appeal of MiserocchiSupreme Court of Vermont · 2000
  5. In Re VitaleSupreme Court of Vermont · 1989

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by41 opinions

  1. In re Bjerke Zoning Permit DenialSupreme Court of Vermont · 2014
  2. In Re Tyler Self-Storage Unit PermitsSupreme Court of Vermont · 2011
  3. Ferrisburgh Realty Investors v. SchumacherSupreme Court of Vermont · 2010
  4. In re Toor and Toor Living Trust NOVSupreme Court of Vermont · 2012
  5. In re Snyder Group, Inc. PUD Final PlatSupreme Court of Vermont · 2020

36 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API