Legal Opinion

Appeal of Weeks

Supreme Court of Vermont

Decided May 1, 1998No. 97-039PublishedCited by 120 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtAmestoy, C.J.

The Town of Shoreham appeals the Environmental Court’s ruling that two adjoining parcels of land owned by appellees Lloyd and Elizabeth Weeks are exempt from the Town’s minimum lot size requirement and therefore may be developed separately. The Environmental Court found that, although the two exempt undersized lots would ordinarily merge into one unit when appellees brought them into affiliated ownership, a steep ravine between the parcels divides the lots and prevents them from being used functionally as one property and thereby precludes merger. Because we conclude that the Town’s zoning…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Lubinsky v. Fair Haven Zoning BoardSupreme Court of Vermont · 1986
  2. In Re VitaleSupreme Court of Vermont · 1989
  3. Allen v. AdamiNew York Court of Appeals · 1976
  4. Secretary, Vermont Agency of Natural Resources v. Handy Family EnterprisesSupreme Court of Vermont · 1995
  5. Rowe v. BrownSupreme Court of Vermont · 1991

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by120 opinions

  1. In Re Appeal of Trahan NovSupreme Court of Vermont · 2008
  2. In Re HandySupreme Court of Vermont · 2000
  3. Town of Killington v. StateSupreme Court of Vermont · 2001
  4. In Re Appeal of MiserocchiSupreme Court of Vermont · 2000
  5. In Re Appeal of 232511 Investments, Ltd.Supreme Court of Vermont · 2006

115 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API