Legal Opinion

Drumheller v. Shelburne Zoning Board of Adjustment

Supreme Court of Vermont

Decided December 28, 1990No. 88-203PublishedCited by 26 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtDooley, J.

Appellants Philip and Linda Drumjheller sought a declaratory ruling that a part of their property should be considered to be a separate lot for the purposes of the Town of Shelburne zoning and subdivision regulations, even though its area is less than allowed by the zoning ordinance for the district in which it lies. The Chittenden Superior Court ruled that all of appellants’ property must be considered to be a single lot, and therefore that a part could not be conveyed free of local regulation and permit requirements. We affirm.

The Browns, appellants’ predecessors in title, acquired a…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Lubinsky v. Fair Haven Zoning BoardSupreme Court of Vermont · 1986
  2. Hinsdale v. Village of Essex JunctionSupreme Court of Vermont · 1990
  3. Parks v. BOARD OF CTY. COM'RS OF TILLAMOOK CTY.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 1972
  4. Application of McDonald's Corp.Supreme Court of Vermont · 1989
  5. Blundon v. Town of StamfordSupreme Court of Vermont · 1990

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by26 opinions

  1. Appeal of WeeksSupreme Court of Vermont · 1998
  2. Robes v. Town of HartfordSupreme Court of Vermont · 1993
  3. In re Application of Lathrop Limited Partnership I, II and IIISupreme Court of Vermont · 2015
  4. In Re Appeal of Taft Corners Associates, Inc.Supreme Court of Vermont · 2000
  5. Wilcox v. Village of Manchester Zoning Board of AdjustmentSupreme Court of Vermont · 1992

21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API