Legal Opinion

Wilcox v. Village of Manchester Zoning Board of Adjustment

Supreme Court of Vermont

Decided September 4, 1992No. 91-466PublishedCited by 31 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJohnson, J.

Plaintiff appeals from a superior court decision upholding the ruling of the Village of Manchester Zoning Board, which prohibited the subdivision of his property because it would leave an undersized lot, in violation of the Village’s minimum-lot-size ordinance. We agree with plaintiff that summary judgment should not have been granted because issues of fact remain as to whether he qualifies for an exception to the minimum-lot-size requirement. We reverse and remand.

Plaintiff’s land consists of three parcels, created and conveyed by deed to his parents in 1950. The conveyance was prior to the…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Toys, Inc. v. F.M. Burlington Co.Supreme Court of Vermont · 1990
  2. Sturges v. Town of ChilmarkMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1980
  3. Drumheller v. Shelburne Zoning Board of AdjustmentSupreme Court of Vermont · 1990
  4. Loveladies Property Owners Ass'n, Inc. v. BARNEGAT CITY, ETC., CO.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1960
  5. Hutson v. Agricultural Ditch & Reservoir Co.Supreme Court of Colorado · 1986

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by31 opinions

  1. Appeal of WeeksSupreme Court of Vermont · 1998
  2. In re Pierce Subdivision ApplicationSupreme Court of Vermont · 2008
  3. Lane v. Town of GraftonSupreme Court of Vermont · 1997
  4. In Re Miller Subdivision Final PlanSupreme Court of Vermont · 2008
  5. Candido v. Polymers, Inc.Supreme Court of Vermont · 1996

26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API