Legal Opinion

In Re Appeal of Jenness & Berrie

Supreme Court of Vermont

Decided September 5, 2008No. 2007-318PublishedCited by 20 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtReiber, C.J.

¶ 1. This appeal from the Environmental Court raises three issues. The first, raised by permit applicants Jenness and Berrie, is whether the court erred in concluding that a lot they owned was not entitled to an existing-small-lot exemption under 24 V.S.A. § 4406(1). The second issue, raised on cross-appeal by neighboring landowners, is whether the Environmental Court erred in holding that an existing small lot need not comply with the generally applicable dimensional requirements of the local zoning ordinance. Third, neighbors contend that the court erred in concluding that this property has…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Appeal of WeeksSupreme Court of Vermont · 1998
  2. Robes v. Town of HartfordSupreme Court of Vermont · 1993
  3. In re Vermont National BankSupreme Court of Vermont · 1991
  4. Our Lady of Ephesus House of Prayer, Inc. v. Town of JamaicaSupreme Court of Vermont · 2005
  5. Wilcox v. Village of Manchester Zoning Board of AdjustmentSupreme Court of Vermont · 1992

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by20 opinions

  1. In re Confluence Behavioral Health, LLC Conditional Use to Operate a Therapeutic Community Residence Program (Jason Albert, Appellants)Supreme Court of Vermont · 2017
  2. Jensen v. JensenSupreme Court of Vermont · 1981
  3. Vermont National Telephone Company v. Department of TaxesSupreme Court of Vermont · 2020
  4. 2508 West Lake Road Nonconforming Structure - Decision on MotionVermont Superior Court · 2025
  5. Anne C. Rose Revocable Trust Building PermitVermont Superior Court · 2008

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API