Legal Opinion

Richards v. Stanley

California Supreme Court

Decided June 11, 1954No. S. F. 18941PublishedCited by 208 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtTraynor, J.

Plaintiff brought this action to recover damages for personal injuries suffered when his motorcycle collided with an automobile owned by defendants Mr. and Mrs. Stanley, which was being driven at the time by a thief, defendant Rawlings. The complaint alleged that Mr. and Mrs. Stanley were the owners of an automobile, which Mrs. Stanley parked on Stevenson Street near Second Street in San Francisco, leaving it “unattended and unlocked with the ignition key in said car lock” in violation of section 69 of the municipal code ;* that as a result of this carelessness, defendant Rawlings *62“was…

2Cases cited25 opinions

  1. Ney v. Yellow Cab Co.Illinois Supreme Court · 1954
  2. Baugh v. RogersCalifornia Supreme Court · 1944
  3. Ross v. HartmanCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1943
  4. Routh v. QuinnCalifornia Supreme Court · 1942
  5. Nunneley v. Edgar HotelCalifornia Supreme Court · 1950

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by208 opinions

  1. Dillon v. LeggCalifornia Supreme Court · 1968
  2. Tarasoff v. Regents of University of CaliforniaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1976
  3. Nga Li v. Yellow Cab Co.California Supreme Court · 1975
  4. Palma v. U.S. Industrial Fasteners, Inc.California Supreme Court · 1984
  5. Vesely v. SagerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1971

203 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API