Woods v. Young
California Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
KENNARD,J.
—In 1975, the Legislature enacted the Medical Injury Compensation Reform Act (MICRA) in response to a health care crisis caused by a rapid increase in premiums for medical malpractice insurance. Among MICRA’s many provisions is one that requires a plaintiff, before filing an action based on a health care provider’s professional negligence, to give the defendant at least 90 days’ notice of intent to sue.
The issue in this case is whether the 90-day notice provision tolls or extends the 1-year statute of limitations for medical malpractice actions,1 and, if so, under what…
2Cases cited31 opinions
- Chevron Oil Co. v. HusonSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
- Dyna-Med, Inc. v. Fair Employment & Housing CommissionCalifornia Supreme Court · 1987
- Nga Li v. Yellow Cab Co.California Supreme Court · 1975
- Moradi-Shalal v. Fireman's Fund Ins. CompaniesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1988
- People v. WoodheadCalifornia Supreme Court · 1987
26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by223 opinions
- Norgart v. Upjohn Co.California Supreme Court · 1999
- People v. GardeleyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1996
- Chia-Lee Hsu v. AbbaraCalifornia Supreme Court · 1995
- People v. WelchCalifornia Supreme Court · 1999
- Christensen v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1991
218 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.