Do v. American Family Mutual Insurance Co.
Court of Appeals of Minnesota
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
MINGE, Judge.
This appeal arises out of a claim by appellant injured party against his automobile-insurance carrier for no-fault and underinsurance benefits. Appellant asserts that the district court erred in relying on the collateral-source rule to offset the amount recovered in his prior settlement with the tortfeasor’s liability insurer against a jury award of damages. Because the prior settlement is a collateral source under Minn.Stat. § 548.36 (2006) and was for general unspecified damages, the district court did not err in deducting it from the ultimate jury award in appellant’s…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Imlay v. City of Lake CrystalSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1990
- Weaver v. State Farm Insurance CompaniesSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2000
- Scheibel v. Illinois Farmers Insurance Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 2000
- Dean v. American Family Mutual Insurance Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1995
- Buck v. SchneiderCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1987
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Do v. American Family Mutual Insurance Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 2010
- Do v. American Family Mutual Insurance Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 2010
- Do v. American Family Mutual Insurance Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 2010