Legal Opinion

Do v. American Family Mutual Insurance Co.

Court of Appeals of Minnesota

Decided July 8, 2008No. A07-1461PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

MINGE, Judge.

This appeal arises out of a claim by appellant injured party against his automobile-insurance carrier for no-fault and underinsurance benefits. Appellant asserts that the district court erred in relying on the collateral-source rule to offset the amount recovered in his prior settlement with the tortfeasor’s liability insurer against a jury award of damages. Because the prior settlement is a collateral source under Minn.Stat. § 548.36 (2006) and was for general unspecified damages, the district court did not err in deducting it from the ultimate jury award in appellant’s…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Imlay v. City of Lake CrystalSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1990
  2. Weaver v. State Farm Insurance CompaniesSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2000
  3. Scheibel v. Illinois Farmers Insurance Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 2000
  4. Dean v. American Family Mutual Insurance Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1995
  5. Buck v. SchneiderCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1987

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Do v. American Family Mutual Insurance Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 2010
  2. Do v. American Family Mutual Insurance Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 2010
  3. Do v. American Family Mutual Insurance Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 2010

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API