Legal Opinion
Scheibel v. Illinois Farmers Insurance Co.
Supreme Court of Minnesota
Decided July 27, 2000No. C1-98-2097PublishedCited by 22 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
PAUL H. ANDERSON, Justice.
Daniel Scheibel suffered injuries that were causally related to two separate motor vehicle accidents, both occurring when he was insured under a no-fault automobile insurance policy with Illinois Farmers Insurance Company. Illinois Farmers paid Scheibel his policy maximum for medical benefits for the second accident, but not the first. Because Scheibel was not fully reimbursed for the total amount of the loss he incurred as a result of both accidents, he brought this action in district court to recover his additional medical expense loss and income loss…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Offerdahl v. University of Minnesota Hospitals & ClinicsSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1988
- Hubred v. Control Data Corp.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1989
- Amaral v. Saint Cloud HospitalSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1999
- Westendorf Ex Rel. Westendorf v. StassonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1983
- MILBANK MUTUAL INSURANCE COMPANY v. KluverSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1974
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by22 opinions
- Nelson v. American Family Insurance GroupSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2002
- Babinski v. American Family Insurance GroupCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2009
- Lynch v. American Family Mutual Insurance Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 2001
- Cody Devereaux Sleiter v. American Family Mutual Insurance CompanySupreme Court of Minnesota · 2015
- Bundul v. Travelers Indemnity Co.Court of Appeals of Minnesota · 2008
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.