Legal Opinion

Imlay v. City of Lake Crystal

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided March 30, 1990No. CX-88-2551PublishedCited by 55 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

POPOVICH, Chief Justice.

Appellants brought a personal injury action against respondent city, in its capacity as operator of a liquor store, for injuries sustained in a collision with an uninsured, intoxicated motorcyclist who was served alcoholic beverages by respondent while obviously intoxicated. Respondent city filed a third-party action against the motorcyclist’s estate. The jury found respondent city 20% at fault and the motorcyclist 80%, and returned a verdict for appellants for over $2.2 million. The trial court reduced this amount by certain collateral source payments appellants…

2Cases cited21 opinions

  1. Garcia v. San Antonio Metropolitan Transit AuthoritySupreme Court of the United States · 1985
  2. Indian Towing Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1955
  3. Evangelatos v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1988
  4. Spanel v. Mounds View School District No. 621Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1962
  5. Cairl v. StateSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1982

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by55 opinions

  1. Staab v. Diocese of St. CloudSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2012
  2. Wells v. Panola County Bd. of Educ.Mississippi Supreme Court · 1994
  3. Heinz v. Chicago Road Investment Co.Michigan Court of Appeals · 1996
  4. Schweich v. Ziegler, Inc.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1990
  5. Kolton v. County of AnokaSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2002

50 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API