Buck v. Schneider
Court of Appeals of Minnesota
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
SEDGWICK, Judge.
This appeal is from a judgment for appellants in their negligence action against respondent Robert Schneider. Appellant Rodney Buck settled his claim for workers’ compensation benefits with his employer and the employer’s insurer. As part of the settlement, the employer and insurer assigned Buck their subrogation rights to the benefits. Applying the recently-enacted “collateral source” statute, the trial court reduced Buck’s damage award against respondent to reflect the amount of workers’ compensation benefits he had received. Buck contends his assertion of the…
2Cited by18 opinions
- Johnson v. Consolidated Freightways, Inc.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1988
- Imlay v. City of Lake CrystalSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1990
- Dean v. American Family Mutual Insurance Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1995
- Kohn v. La Manufacture Francaise Des Pneumatiques MichelinCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1991
- Kersting v. Royal-Milbank InsuranceCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1990
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.