Legal Opinion

Do v. American Family Mutual Insurance Co.

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided March 25, 2010No. A07-1461Published

1Opinion of the Court

779 N.W.2d 853 (2010)

Dean DO, Appellant,

v.

AMERICAN FAMILY MUTUAL INSURANCE COMPANY, Respondent.

No. A07-1461.

Supreme Court of Minnesota.

March 25, 2010.

D. Scott Dunham, D. Scott Dunham, P.A., Stillwater, MN, for appellant.

Tammy M. Reno, Brown & Carlson, P.A., Minneapolis, MN, for respondent.

Paul D. Peterson, Lori L. Barton, Harper & Peterson, P.L.L.C., Woodbury, MN, for amicus curiae Minnesota Association for Justice.

OPINION

DIETZEN, Justice.

Appellant Dean Do brought an action against his automobile insurer, respondent American Family Mutual Insurance Company (American Family), seeking no-fault…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Hoang Minh Ly v. NystromSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2000
  2. Van Tassel v. Horace Mann Insurance CompanySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1973
  3. Imlay v. City of Lake CrystalSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1990
  4. Rosenberg v. Heritage Renovations, LLCSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2004
  5. Hueper v. GoodrichSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1982

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API