Legal Opinion

Dean v. American Family Mutual Insurance Co.

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided August 4, 1995No. C5-94-1042PublishedCited by 19 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

GARDEBRING, Justice.

In a claim for underinsured motorist benefits, the trial court applied the collateral source provision in Minn.Stat. § 548.36 (1994) to reduce the aggregate damage award before subtracting the amount associated with the claimant’s comparative fault, as determined in an earlier jury trial. The court of appeals affirmed, and we reverse.

While driving his own car, Dale Dean, the plaintiff-respondent in this matter, was injured in a two-car collision with a vehicle driven by Nathan Sing. The passenger in Sing’s car was killed, and the trustee for her heirs and next of…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. State Ex Rel. Cooper v. FrenchSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1990
  2. Schmidt v. ClothierSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1983
  3. Johnson v. American Family Mutual Insurance Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1988
  4. Imlay v. City of Lake CrystalSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1990
  5. Hueper v. GoodrichSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1982

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by19 opinions

  1. Lopez v. Safeway Stores, Inc.Court of Appeals of Arizona · 2006
  2. Do v. American Family Mutual Insurance Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 2010
  3. Washington v. Milbank Insurance Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1997
  4. Gusk v. Farm Bureau Mutual Insurance Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1997
  5. Schmuckler v. CreurerCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1998

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API