Legal Opinion

Sturges v. Charles L. Harney, Inc.

California Court of Appeal

Decided November 19, 1958No. Civ. 18074PublishedCited by 35 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtKaufman, P. J.

Plaintiffs brought this action for damages and for injunctive relief, against Charles L. Harney individually, and Charles L. Harney, Inc., a corporation. The defendant cross-complained against the city and county of San Francisco. The trial court entered an order striking the cross-complaint and entered a judgment of nonsuit as to Charles L. Harney, individually. After a jury trial, the court rendered judgment on the verdict in favor of the plaintiffs, awarding both compensatory and punitive damages. After further proceedings, without a jury, the trial court issued a mandatory injunction,…

2Cases cited35 opinions

  1. Davis v. HearstCalifornia Supreme Court · 1911
  2. Satterlee v. Orange Glenn School DistrictCalifornia Supreme Court · 1947
  3. State Rubbish Collectors Ass'n v. SiliznoffCalifornia Supreme Court · 1952
  4. Gombos v. AsheCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1958
  5. Donnelly v. Southern Pacific Co.California Supreme Court · 1941

30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by35 opinions

  1. Toole v. Richardson-Merrell Inc.California Court of Appeal · 1967
  2. Barth v. B. F. Goodrich Tire Co.California Court of Appeal · 1968
  3. G. D. Searle & Co. v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1975
  4. Stoiber v. HoneychuckCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1980
  5. Smith v. County of Los AngelesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1989

30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API