Hicks v. Drew
California Supreme Court
Appeal from a judgment of the Superior Court of San Bernardino County and from an order denying a new trial. John L. Campbell, Judge. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.
1Opinion of the CourtGaroutte, J.
This is an action to recover damages for injuries to real estate. An appeal is prosecuted to this court from the judgment and order denying plaintiff’s motion for a new trial.
Plaintiff objected to Mr. Annable, one of defendant’s attorneys, appearing in the case, upon the ground that liis prior professional relations with her had been such as, in law, to deprive him of that right. On taking evidence upon this question, the court held against her contention, and reversible error is now claimed upon that ruling. There is no serious conflict as to the facts bearing upon this matter, but wherever…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Pumpelly v. Green Bay Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1872
- Transportation Co. v. ChicagoSupreme Court of the United States · 1879
- Conniff v. City of San FranciscoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1885
- McLennan v. OhmenCalifornia Supreme Court · 1888
- Triscony v. BrandensteinCalifornia Supreme Court · 1885
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by50 opinions
- Clayworth v. Pfizer, Inc.California Supreme Court · 2010
- Meehan v. HoppsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1955
- Joerger v. Pacific Gas & Electric Co.California Supreme Court · 1929
- Jongeward v. BNSF Railway Co.Washington Supreme Court · 2012
- Collier v. Merced Irrigation DistrictCalifornia Supreme Court · 1931
45 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.