Legal Opinion

Groce v. Fidelity General Insurance Company

Oregon Supreme Court

Decided December 18, 1968PublishedCited by 75 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtGoodwin, J.

Fidelity General Insurance Company, the defendant in these consolidated cases, challenges judgments entered upon verdicts in favor of two plaintiffs who brought actions as assignees of the defendant’s named insured. The plaintiffs previously had recovered judgments against the insured for damages in excess of his policy limits. There is also a cross appeal seeldng attorney fees.

The seven assignments of error on appeal present questions that will be discussed under two general subjects: (1) the assignability of the insured’s cause of action against his insurer for failure to act in good faith…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Comunale v. Traders & General InsuranceCalifornia Supreme Court · 1958
  2. Gray v. Nationwide Mutual InsuranceSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1966
  3. Brown v. Guarantee InsuranceCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1957
  4. Ritter v. BEALSOregon Supreme Court · 1961
  5. General Accident Fire & Life Assurance Corp. v. LittleArizona Supreme Court · 1968

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by75 opinions

  1. State Farm Fire & Casualty Co. v. GandyTexas Supreme Court · 1996
  2. Georgetown Realty, Inc. v. Home InsuranceOregon Supreme Court · 1992
  3. American Family Mutual Insurance Co. v. AllenSupreme Court of Colorado · 2004
  4. Farris v. United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co.Oregon Supreme Court · 1978
  5. Stubblefield v. St. Paul Fire & Marine InsuranceOregon Supreme Court · 1973

70 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API