Lamb-Weston, Inc. v. Oregon Automobile Insurance
Oregon Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtPerry, J.
Defendant appeals from a judgment in the sum of $3,399.23. The case was tried without a jury. There are two assignments of error, the first listing eight subdivisions, and the second, two. The first assignment, in general, challenges rulings of the trial court in denying motions for nonsuit and for judgment for defendant. The second assignment of error raises the question of whether or not the trial court erred in entering judgment against the defendant for the entire loss, instead of prorating the loss between the two insurers.
*113The essential facts are these: The plaintiff Lamb-Weston, Inc.,…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- Cosmopolitan Mutual Insurance v. Continental Casualty Co.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1959
- Woodrich Construction Co. v. Indemnity Insurance Co. of North AmericaSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1958
- Pauline v. FitzpatrickCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1957
- Continental Cas. Co. v. WeekesSupreme Court of Florida · 1954
- Grasberger v. Liebert & Obert, Inc.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1939
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by242 opinions
- American International Specialty Lines Insurance v. Canal Indemnity Co.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2003
- Waterway Terminals Co. v. P. S. Lord Mechanical ContractorsOregon Supreme Court · 1965
- Putnam v. New Amsterdam Casualty Co.Illinois Supreme Court · 1970
- Federal Kemper Insurance v. Health Insurance Administration, Inc.Michigan Supreme Court · 1986
- New Amsterdam Casualty Co. v. Certain UnderwritersIllinois Supreme Court · 1966
237 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.