Kiem to v. State Farm Mutual Insurance
Court of Appeals of Oregon
1Opinion of the CourtLandau, J.
This is a “phantom vehicle” case, in which plaintiffs Kiem To and Chuc Nguyen are attempting to recover under an uninsured motorist provision of their automobile insurance policy for injuries resulting from an accident that they allege was caused by an unidentified vehicle. At issue is the proper construction of a clause in plaintiffs’ policy, which is based on ORS 742.504(2)(g), providing that the facts of phantom vehicle accidents must be corroborated by the testimony of someone other than a person who “has a claim” against the insurer resulting from that accident. Plaintiffs attempted to…
2Cases cited19 opinions
- Yartzoff v. Democrat-Herald Pub. Co., Inc.Oregon Supreme Court · 1978
- Perez v. State Farm Mutual Automobile InsuranceOregon Supreme Court · 1980
- Cochran v. ConnellCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1981
- McKean-Coffman v. Employment DivisionOregon Supreme Court · 1992
- McKean-Coffman v. Employment DivisionOregon Supreme Court · 1992
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- To v. State Farm Mutual InsuranceOregon Supreme Court · 1994
- Westwood Construction Co. v. Hallmark Inns & Resorts, Inc.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 2002
- Gerken v. Mutual of Enumclaw InsuranceCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1994
- Eduardo v. Clatsop Community Resource Development Corp.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 2000
- Fox v. Country Mutual InsuranceCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2000
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.