Louisville & Nashville Railroad v. Barber Asphalt Paving Co.
Supreme Court of the United States
ERROR TO THE COURT OP APPEALS' OP THE STATE OP KENTUCKY. .The facts are stated in the opinion.
1Opinion of the CourtJustice Holmes
This is a proceeding under the Kentucky Statutes, § 2834, to enforce a lien upon a lot adjoining a part of Frankfort avenue, in Louisville, for grading, curbing and paving with asphalt the carriageway of that part of the avenue. The defendant, the plaintiff in error, pleaded, that its only interest in'the lot was a right of way for its main roadbed, and that neither the right of way nor the lot would or could- get any benefit from the improvement, but on the contrary rather would be hurt by the increase of travel close to the defendant’s tracks. On- this ground it set up that any special…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Chicago, Burlington & Quincy Railroad v. ChicagoSupreme Court of the United States · 1897
- Davidson v. New OrleansSupreme Court of the United States · 1878
- French v. Barber Asphalt Paving Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1901
- Spencer v. MerchantSupreme Court of the United States · 1888
- Illinois Central Railroad v. DecaturSupreme Court of the United States · 1893
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by176 opinions
- Union Refrigerator Transit Co. v. KentuckySupreme Court of the United States · 1905
- Boston Chamber of Commerce v. City of BostonSupreme Court of the United States · 1910
- Jackman v. Rosenbaum Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1922
- Bain Peanut Co. of Tex. v. PinsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1931
- Phillip Wagner, Inc. v. LeserSupreme Court of the United States · 1915
171 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.