Legal Opinion

Pulcifer v. County of Alameda

California Supreme Court

Decided November 22, 1946No. S. F. 17209PublishedCited by 55 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtGibson, C. J.

The petitioners, justices of the peace of Alameda County and the personal representatives of a deceased justice, seek to compel respondents to pay salaries at the increased rates established by an ordinance adopted May 28, 1942, within six months of the election of such officers. They have appealed from a judgment of dismissal which followed the sustaining of a demurrer to their petition.

This appeal involves the validity and effect of section 12(b) of the Charter of Alameda County which provides that ‘1 The compensation of elective officers shall be fixed at least six months prior to the…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Pipoly v. BensonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1942
  2. Natural Milk Producers Ass'n v. City & County of San FranciscoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1942
  3. Abraham v. SimsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1935
  4. Francis v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1935
  5. Harrison v. ColganCalifornia Supreme Court · 1905

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by55 opinions

  1. Morris v. County of MarinCalifornia Supreme Court · 1977
  2. Hall v. City of TaftCalifornia Supreme Court · 1956
  3. Carter v. Seaboard Finance Co.California Supreme Court · 1949
  4. People v. McGeeCalifornia Supreme Court · 1977
  5. Edwards v. SteeleCalifornia Supreme Court · 1979

50 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API