Legal Opinion

Estate of Mitchell

California Supreme Court

Decided March 24, 1942No. S. F. 16393PublishedCited by 36 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtShenk, J.

The executors of the will of James McL. Mitchell, deceased, appeal from an order directing them to pay to the respondent a real estate commission on the sale of real property consummated and confirmed by the court in the course of the administration of the estate of the decedent.

The respondent, a duly licensed real estate agent, was employed under a contract in writing to sell a ranch belonging to the estate. The authorization was contained in a letter written by one of the executors in response to a letter of the respondent requesting authority to list the property. The executor wrote: “We…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Chauncey v. Dyke Bros.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1902
  2. Rutledge v. City of EurekaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1925
  3. Chadbourne v. ChadbourneCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1911
  4. Wilson v. FlemingCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1930
  5. Pappadatos v. Superior Court of S.F.California Supreme Court · 1930

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by36 opinions

  1. Fein v. Permanente Medical GroupCalifornia Supreme Court · 1985
  2. Estate of RuleCalifornia Supreme Court · 1944
  3. Carter v. Seaboard Finance Co.California Supreme Court · 1949
  4. McCluskey v. WareCalifornia Supreme Court · 1944
  5. People v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1970

31 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API