Wray v. Howard
Supreme Court of Oklahoma
Error from District Court, Tulsa County; N. E. McNeill, Judge. Action toy Lillie Wray against O. R. Howard, J. A. Bearman, P. B. Righter, and W. H. Forbes to cancel deeds, mortgage, etc. Judgment for defendants, and. plaintiff brings error.
1Opinion of the CourtBailey, J.
This action was commenced in the district court of Tulsa county on the 24th day of February, 1916, by the plaintiff in error against the defendants in error to set aside and cancel certain deeds, mortgage, etc., made by the guardian of plaintiff in error and his grantees, and also cre-tain orders of the county court of Tulsa county. The guardian, said purchasers, and mortgagee were made parties defendant. Amended petition was thereafter, filed and a demurrer to said petition sustained on the ground that “such petition does not state facts sufficient to constitute a cause of action in favor of…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Brown v. TrentSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1912
- McIntosh v. HoltgraveSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1920
- Atwood v. RoseSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1912
- Griffin v. CulpSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1918
- Emmerson v. BotkinSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1910
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by30 opinions
- Harjo v. JohnstonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1940
- Sandlin v. BarkerSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1923
- Beatty v. BeattySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1925
- Cochran v. BarkusSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1925
- Manuel v. KiddSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1927
25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.