Legal Opinion

Atwood v. Rose

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided March 19, 1912No. 1451PublishedCited by 38 opinions

Error from District Court, Oklahoma County; Geo. W. Clark, Judge, Action by S. Atwood against Mrs. Forster Rose and another. Judgment for defendants, and plaintiff brings error.

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

BREWER, C.

This is a suit for specific performance of a contract to sell land. It was filed in the district court of Oklahoma county on the 31st day of July, 1909. A motion to make more definite and certain being sustained to the first amended petition, the second amended petition was filed, to both counts of which a general demurrer was sustained.

The main question to be decided in the case being as to whether or not the second amended petition states facts sufficient to constitute a cause of action, we here insert the material parts of said amended petition, as follows:

"That on the…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Bibb v. AllenSupreme Court of the United States · 1893
  2. Minneapolis & St. Louis Railway v. Columbus Rolling MillSupreme Court of the United States · 1886
  3. Beckwith v. TalbotSupreme Court of the United States · 1877
  4. Ryan v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1890
  5. Halsell v. Renfrow and EdwardsSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1904

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by38 opinions

  1. City of Shawnee v. CheekSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1913
  2. Fretz v. City of EdmondSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1916
  3. Wray v. HowardSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1920
  4. Central Mortgage Co. v. Michigan State Life Ins. Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1914
  5. Thomas J. Baird Inv. Co. v. HarrisCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1913

33 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API