Legal Opinion

Sandlin v. Barker

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided June 5, 1923No. 11630, 11631PublishedCited by 35 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtCochran, J.

The two cases which have •been consolidated here involve the allotment of Louis Barker and Emma Barker, newborn Creek freedmen. These allottees died on January 6 and 7, 1911, respectively, and were minors at the time of their death. George W. Davis was thereafter appointed administrator of the estates of Louis Barker and Emma Barker, in separate proceedings in Okmulgee county, and, as administrator of said estates, sold the aforesaid allotments for the purpose of paying debts due by the estates of the allottees. These suits were filed by the heirs of the allottees to recover the lands so…

2Cases cited39 opinions

  1. Pettis v. JohnstonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1920
  2. Groesbeck v. SeeleyMichigan Supreme Court · 1865
  3. Jefferson v. WinklerSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1910
  4. Roth v. Union Nat. Bank of BartlesvilleSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1916
  5. Bell v. FitzpatrickSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1916

34 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by35 opinions

  1. Jenkins v. FrederickSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1952
  2. United States v. 7,405.3 Acres of LandCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1938
  3. Warner v. MasonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1925
  4. Edmison v. CrutsingerSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1933
  5. Joines v. PattersonSupreme Court of the United States · 1927

30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API