State v. Spencer
Supreme Court of North Carolina
1Opinion of the Court
BRANCH, Justice.
Upon the call of his case for trial, and before pleading, defendant through counsel moved to quash the bills of indictment on the ground that his constitutional right to a speedy trial had been violated.
We note at the outset that the motion should have been to dismiss rather than to quash; however, the trial judge apparently treated the motion as a motion to dismiss and we therefore choose to consider the question of speedy trial.
The trial judge considered the records of the case, statements of defense counsel and statements of the solicitor for the State, and, after making…
2Cases cited24 opinions
- Brinegar v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1949
- Jones v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1960
- Hester v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1924
- Beavers v. HaubertSupreme Court of the United States · 1905
- State v. VestalSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1971
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by93 opinions
- State v. BrownSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1984
- State v. McQueenSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1978
- State v. BrittSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1977
- State v. BooneSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1977
- State v. BaxterSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1974
88 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.