Legal Opinion
State v. McQueen
Supreme Court of North Carolina
Decided June 6, 1978No. 92PublishedCited by 104 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
LAKE, Justice.
The defendant’s first contention is that the court committed reversible error in the overruling of his motion to dismiss the indictments for the reason that the State failed to comply with the Interstate Agreement on Detainers Act. G.S. 15A-761 et seq. Article III of this Act provides:
“(a) Whenever a person has entered upon a term of imprisonment in a penal or correctional institution of a party state, and whenever during the continuance of the term of imprisonment there is pending in any other party state any untried indictment * * * on the basis of which a detainer has been…
2Cases cited30 opinions
- Barker v. WingoSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Klopfer v. North CarolinaSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
- State v. McClainSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1954
- State v. AtkinsonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1969
- State v. JohnsonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1969
25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by104 opinions
- State v. BarfieldSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1979
- State v. HurdSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1981
- People v. ShirleyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1982
- State v. BrownSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1987
- State v. MacKSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1980
99 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.