Legal Opinion

State v. Brown

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided April 3, 1984No. 588A83PublishedCited by 243 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

*566BRANCH, Chief Justice.

Defendant assigns as error the trial judge’s denial of his motion to dismiss.

It is well settled that upon a motion to dismiss in a criminal action, all the evidence admitted, whether competent or incompetent, must be considered by the trial judge in the light most favorable to the State, giving the State the benefit of every reasonable inference that might be drawn therefrom. Any contradictions or discrepancies in the evidence are for resolution by the jury. State v. Witherspoon, 293 N.C. 321, 237 S.E. 2d 822 (1977). The trial judge must decide whether there is…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Jackson v. VirginiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
  2. State v. SmithSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1980
  3. State v. HarveySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1972
  4. The People v. GallowayIllinois Supreme Court · 1963
  5. State v. WitherspoonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1977

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by243 opinions

  1. State v. RogersSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1986
  2. State v. StokesSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1987
  3. State v. ZunigaSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1987
  4. State v. AverySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1985
  5. State v. AbrahamSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1994

238 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API