Legal Opinion

Brinegar v. United States

Supreme Court of the United States

Decided October 10, 1949No. 12PublishedCited by 5,716 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Rutledge

Brinegar was convicted of importing intoxicating liquor into Oklahoma from Missouri in violation of the federal statute which forbids such importation contrary to the laws of any state.1 His conviction was based in *162part on the use in evidence against him of liquor seized from his automobile in the course of the alleged unlawful importation.

Prior to the trial Brinegar moved to suppress this evidence as having been secured through an unlawful search and seizure.2 The motion was denied, as was a renewal of the objection at the trial.

The Court of Appeals affirmed the conviction, 165 F. 2d 512,…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. Carroll v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1925
  2. Michelson v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1949
  3. Steele v. United States No. 1Supreme Court of the United States · 1925
  4. Husty v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1931
  5. Locke v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1813

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5,716 opinions

  1. Jackson v. VirginiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
  2. Terry v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
  3. Illinois v. GatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
  4. Katz v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
  5. Wong Sun v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1963

5,711 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API