State v. Britt
Supreme Court of North Carolina
1Opinion of the Court
MOORE, Justice.
Defendant first contends that the trial court erred in failing to allow into evidence the blood alcohol level of the deceased. Defendant admits that the autopsy report and related reports (including a toxicology report) identified by Dr. Marvin Thompson, an expert in pathology, were not offered into evidence at trial by either the State or defendant. Defendant only assigns as error the failure of the court to allow the oral testimony of Dr. Thompson relating to the blood alcohol level of the deceased.
As stated in Robinson v. Insurance Co., 255 N.C. 669, 672, 674, 122 S.E. 2d…
2Cases cited57 opinions
- United States v. BallSupreme Court of the United States · 1896
- State v. WestbrookSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1971
- State v. MonkSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1975
- State v. BrittSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1975
- State v. TaylorSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1972
52 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by97 opinions
- State v. YoungSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1985
- State v. HillSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1984
- State v. McCollumSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1993
- State v. GreenSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1994
- State v. ZunigaSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1987
92 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.