Legal Opinion

Bratcher v. National Grange Mutual Insurance

Court of Appeals of South Carolina

Decided April 27, 1987No. 0945PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Sanders, Chief Judge:

This is an appeal from an order of the Circuit Court declaring that respondent Franklin W. Bratcher is entitled to collect certain underinsured motorist benefits from appellant National Grange Mutual Insurance Company. We affirm.

Franklin Bratcher was riding as a passenger in a car owned and being driven by his father, Welton C. Bratcher. The car was involved in an accident in which Franklin Bratcher was seriously injured. Welton Bratcher was at fault in causing the accident. The car was insured under a policy issued to him by National Grange. The policy provided liability…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Millers Casualty Insurance Co. of Texas v. BriggsWashington Supreme Court · 1983
  2. Gambrell v. Travelers Ins. CompaniesSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1983
  3. Hogan v. Home Insurance Co.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1973
  4. Busby v. State Farm Mutual Automobile InsuranceCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 1984
  5. McDonald v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance CompanyCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 1985

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Wolgemuth v. Harleysville Mutual InsuranceSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1988
  2. Newkirk v. United Services Automobile Ass'nSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1989
  3. Kang v. State Farm Mutual Automobile InsuranceHawaii Supreme Court · 1991
  4. MERCURY INDEM. CO. OF ILLINOIS v. KimAppellate Court of Illinois · 2005
  5. American Security Insurance v. HowardCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 1993

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API