McDonald v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company
Court of Appeals of South Carolina
1Opinion of the Court
Sanders, Chief Judge:
This case requires us once more to probe the murky depths of the South Carolina Automobile Reparation Reform Act of 1974, Sections 56-11-110 to -800, Code of Laws of South Carolina, 1976, as amended. The issue presented in the Circuit Court and on appeal is whether insureds are entitled to collect benefits required to be provided by the Act and provided by a motor vehicle insurance policy despite the fact they are injured while occupying a vehicle other than the one on which the policy was issued and despite the further fact the policy contains a provision excluding…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Pennsylvania National Mutual Casualty Insurance v. GartelmanCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1980
- Vernon v. Harleysville Mutual Casualty Co.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1964
- Hogan v. Home Insurance Co.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1973
- Busby v. State Farm Mutual Automobile InsuranceCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 1984
- Holyfield v. Members Mutual Insurance Co.Texas Supreme Court · 1978
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Wolgemuth v. Harleysville Mutual InsuranceSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1988
- Burns v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance CompanySupreme Court of South Carolina · 1989
- Kang v. State Farm Mutual Automobile InsuranceHawaii Supreme Court · 1991
- Alexander v. State Automobile Mutual InsuranceWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1992
- Bratcher v. National Grange Mutual InsuranceCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 1987
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.